PUBLICATION ETHICS

The editorial board of the journal «Bulletin of the Tajik pedagogical institute in the Rasht district. Series law, history, and economic sciences» recognizes the scientific value and practical significance of the authors’ research and engages in scholarly communication and serves as a platform for the development of relevant areas of scientific knowledge.

The editorial board of the journal «Bulletin of the Tajik pedagogical institute in the Rasht district. Series law, history, and economic sciences» is based on generally accepted ethical principles of scientific periodicals and is built taking into account the ethical standards of editors and publishers, enshrined in the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers, developed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

The editorial board of the journal «Bulletin of the Tajik pedagogical institute in the Rasht district. Series law, history, and economic sciences» is guided by the laws of the Republic of Tajikistan “On the Press and Other Mass Media”, “On Copyright and Related Rights”, “On Publishing” other regulatory legal acts of the Republic of Tajikistan in the field of science, and the Charter of the Tajik pedagogical institute in the Rasht district.

CRITERIA FOR SUBMISSION ARTICLES

• Submit a previously unpublished article. The article must contain only the original work of the author(s).
• Inappropriate borrowing, plagiarism, and excessive self-citations are not permitted.
• The article must list as authors only those researchers who made a significant intellectual contribution to the results. It is assumed that at the time of submission, all authors agree to publication in the journal and do not object to the author listing procedure.
• The article must include in the citation list only those sources actually used during the research; all sources must be referenced in the text of the article.
• The data used by the authors for their research must be obtained from authoritative official sources, which must be referenced in the text of the article.
• Provide information on the funding sources for the study (the project within which the article was prepared, for example, departmental research, a grant from the President of the Republic of Tatarstan, etc.);
• Submit the article in accordance with the journal’s requirements.

REVIEW PRINCIPLES:

• The article is reviewed strictly according to the principle of double-blind review: the authors do not know the names of the reviewers, and the reviewers do not know the names of the authors;
• Each manuscript is treated as a confidential document. Any distribution or publication of the reviewer’s materials is prohibited, including for open review purposes, as well as for personal use.
• The purpose of the review is to express the expert’s opinion on the validity, novelty, and significance of the obtained results.
• The object of the review is the research result. The expert opinion must be impartial: a discrepancy in the scientific positions of the author and reviewer is grounds for scientific discussion, but in itself cannot serve as sufficient grounds for refusing to publish the article.
• An article rejected a second time by a reviewer(s) is withdrawn from consideration by the editors (not approved for publication).
• An article is considered accepted for publication if it receives a positive review and is supported by the editorial board. The order and sequence of publication is determined based on the date of receipt of the final version.

VIOLATIONS AND LIABILITY:

• If a violation of publication ethics by an author is identified during the review of an article, this may serve as sufficient grounds for rejection of publication.
• Violations of publication ethics by a reviewer or editor may serve as grounds for termination of cooperation with the journal.
• Violations identified after the article’s publication are subject to detailed review by interested parties in accordance with practices recommended by the editorial board. Minor violations may be corrected by publishing official clarifications. Significant violations result in the article being retracted from publication, with notification posted on the journal’s website and pages.
• A violation of publication ethics may only be established with the participation of all parties to the conflict arising from such a violation. Until such a violation is established, any case must be described as a suspected violation. All such suspected violations are subject to mandatory review by the journal’s editorial board.